<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Iraq&#8217;s Agreeing with Obama &#8211; Backfire on Him?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coonsey.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/will-iraqs-agreeing-with-obama-backfire-on-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coonsey.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/will-iraqs-agreeing-with-obama-backfire-on-him/</link>
	<description>Let's talk politics - Mine and Maybe Yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canker</title>
		<link>http://coonsey.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/will-iraqs-agreeing-with-obama-backfire-on-him/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Canker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coonsey.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-19</guid>
		<description>If that were the case polls would be supporting the war in Iraq right now -- they aren&#039;t.  Besides, the Commander-n-Chief is the one that sets the policy -- not the military on the ground.  The do what the chief tells them to do.

If you know anything about the military then you know that Petraeus knows the chain of command or he wouldn&#039;t have all those stars on his shoulders today.

Petraeus said the following during his last briefing:

a mission focus on either population security or transition alone will not be adequate to achieve our objectives;

the security and local political situations will enable us to draw down the surge forces.

long-term US ground force viability will benefit from force reductions as the surge runs its course;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that were the case polls would be supporting the war in Iraq right now &#8212; they aren&#8217;t.  Besides, the Commander-n-Chief is the one that sets the policy &#8212; not the military on the ground.  The do what the chief tells them to do.</p>
<p>If you know anything about the military then you know that Petraeus knows the chain of command or he wouldn&#8217;t have all those stars on his shoulders today.</p>
<p>Petraeus said the following during his last briefing:</p>
<p>a mission focus on either population security or transition alone will not be adequate to achieve our objectives;</p>
<p>the security and local political situations will enable us to draw down the surge forces.</p>
<p>long-term US ground force viability will benefit from force reductions as the surge runs its course;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodtimepolitics</title>
		<link>http://coonsey.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/will-iraqs-agreeing-with-obama-backfire-on-him/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>goodtimepolitics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coonsey.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Obama is only worried about losing the far left moveon.org support!  He can not win the battle against  General Petraeus a great man with a chest full of medals and the American people will stick with the General on this issue! Obama is a fool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is only worried about losing the far left moveon.org support!  He can not win the battle against  General Petraeus a great man with a chest full of medals and the American people will stick with the General on this issue! Obama is a fool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
